The PS3 didn't "lose" it won big time. The sole purpose of the PS3 was to make sure Blu-ray became dominant. Sony get's a cut of every bluray player, every bluray drive, and every bluray sold. The shareholders are not screaming at Sony. They are laughing all the way to the bank.
share holders. Anything requiring a modicum of thought or effort is dumbed down for a wider audience.
from actually boycotting. Boycotting isn't about getting a company to change so you can go back to buying their shit only for them to start the bad habit all over again. Boycotting is about you personally not contributing to a companies bad habits. Boycotting something doesn't stay an active effort. Once you give something up it is only a short time before you realize you don't need it to be happy, and get use to not having it. I boycotted EA and Activision two years ago, and not ...
Being that ME1 isn't on the PS3 I see no reason to buy ME2 or ME3. I'm pretty sure this menatality is fairly common. Good thinking bioware
I don't buy it. Anything else is only long term leasing.
missed the ps3 makes me not care about ME 2 or ME 3. I didn't start the wheel of time series on book 2 so why would I with Mass Effect?
is that big of a concern for you, then you should not be gaming on a console. You should be gaming on a PC.
all this "new engine" announcement is just an attempt to head off all the criticism. As soon as they announced skyrim the first words out of everybody's mouth was either "If it uses gambryo I'm not buying" or "gambryo sucks". Because an employee was quoted as saying that the rpg they are working on is using gambryo not idtech. He went on to say that the changes they made to gamebryo for the upcoming RPG is bigger than the changes they made between Oblivio...
That usually happens during puberty and after child birth.
that they have this "purchase skills" mechanism that I think is poorly thought out......"Oh I got $5,000 I need to purchase the double back flip to ledge grab so that I can finally reach the sword of truth."
the other is the fast travel. Why on earth in a "platformer" would you give someone the ability to skip the platforms? Fast travel ruined Oblivion and Fallout series because it made traversing the world a series of load screens.
This is exactly why I don't buy digital content. You never really own it.
if they intend to keep b-spec, is more in depth tuning. With how simulated the driving is it's almost as if the designers didn't have the foggiest clue how a car is tuned.
1) Chassis rigidity could have been it's own category.
2) Suspension could have been far more in depth
3) where are the engine swaps?
4) Engine could have been broken down into head and block
Different categories could have been interconnected. e.g. need ...
My one bitch about GT5 is it's aftermarket/tuning aspect. You go from racing simulator to arcade style upgrades. It doesn't have to get all technical with valve lift and duration, but generic upgrade 1/2/3 is lame.
If they are following any type of canon Robin better be a girl.
What I want to know is.....
Can you do engine swaps and can you do turbo kits on naturally aspirated cars? This is always what bothered me about GT.
Games are much more expensive this go around. Half the game is online which is a $600 a month burden, a large portion of the game is sliced off for DLC, and the price has jumped $10. Games have also gotten shorter (which is an indirect cost increase), more shallow (which for gamers that are not in to mindless shit is a bummer), and have less content. Too many games this generation are mediocre....that's what happens when you try to appeal to the broadest audience and fail or you clone. Ho...
This guy must only own an xbox. Because the biggest no brainer from the PS3 didn't make it. Uncharted.
When I had first seen the opening to cowboys and aliens, I thought it was a Fallout movie because he had something stuck to his wrist.
Jurrasic Park 3 was good?
DOA just like THE JUNGLE handheld.
You mean on Xbox live you have 12 year olds screaming racial/sexual slurs.